مزاب..قصيدة العلوة..علو كعب الفن وسمو روحانية التصوف

 

By Ahmed Jalali

Rajab Tayib Erdogan did it again and won a difficult election that was a real test for him and his party.

They said that he threatens Turkish democracy with his penchant for autocracy, so he abandoned his alleged "dictatorship and went at the pace of the confident to the second 

.round and defeated Kilicdaroglu.

Erdogan will rule Türkiye for the next five years. A man has the right to extend his legs in the luxurious Ottoman presidential palace and continue to implement his policies that were characterized by pragmatism, national interest, and international independence of decision.

The "Sultan" of Turkey and his party breathed a sigh of relief while the West - anxious for the future of democracy, oh my God- muffled its tip, bemoaning an unfulfilled joy to see him GO 

Putin was the first to congratulate Erdogan on his victory and summed it all up when he expressed to the Turkish president his certainty that the Turks choosing him once again 

indicates the correctness of his foreign policies.

  Putin is undoubtedly happy that a major regional ally like Erdogan remains at the helm of a pivotal country like Turke 

The first of the Arab congratulators was the Emir of Qatar, while it is expected that congratulations will rain down on Rajab Tayyip s office, as a matter of diplomatic courtesy and reprimand at least, as it is no secret that many Arab regimes are not “fat on honey” with Erdogan "The Islamist", however there crucial questions to ask on this occasion

?Why did the world care so much about Türkiye's election 

It seemed clear that the world, especially the West, was very interested in Turkey's presidential elections, which witnessed an unprecedented global warming and participation rates. NATO, in its own way, took care of this event, and opinion polls predicting Erdogan's fall preceded the results of the ballot boxes. The West has shamelessly  harnessed its black propaganda arsenal in favor of Kilicdarogl 

It is no secret that the West was self-righteous by turning the page on Erdogan's Turkey and its democratic and developmental experience, which has become disturbing to the extent that Ankara's foreign policy has become a decisive player in major international conflicts such as Russia's war on Ukraine.

It is also no secret that the West fears that ballot box experiments will spread to the Arab neighborhood, and agendas will be ruined, as the "democratic" West is interested in keeping the political situation - from water to water - petrified forever. This ossification gives Western circles the required flexibility to draw maps and impose policies that guarantee the continuation of their vital interests until the end of history.

  

|?Why do Turks stick to President Erdogan 

The majority of Turks voted in favor of continuity, not because they are against change, nor because they love Erdogan and die in his "beds". The matter is much deeper and more complex than that: the collective consciousness of the Turks decided to grant Erdogan another mandate because they know fully that it is in their interest for him to stay for the next five years, for the following reasons:

To be a defense wall against the threat that Kilishdar and the machine behind him represent to the multi-ethnic Turkish national fabric and tendencies, especially since Erdogan's rule quelled the violence from which the Turks suffered for decades.

To prevent the military from returning to guarding the Ataturk temple again through coups, which previously represented almost a national sport for tank owners. Memory still preserves well what happened when the military attempted a coup against legitimacy seven years ago when the people and security groupstook to streets with bare chests and light weapons that were sufficient to arrest the putschists and thwart the plot.

- And to work on drawing up a real constitution for Turkey, which has not been allowed for  

 during one hundred years at least.

  

?What are the conclusions of the Turkish lesson 

Perhaps the most important lessons that can be learned from the Turkish experience during Erdogan’s era can be summed up in prominent headlines:

National advancement is possible whenever conditions are met, the most important of which is the existence of an elite that believes in its national project and is able to sacrifice for it.

The national renaissance project has no chance of success unless it makes the human being  its first and last goal in all its policies, and this is what exactly happened in Turkey over the last two decades,

The national renaissance is not based on the ideas of foreigners and does not rely on the arms of strangers. The Turks designed their development model themselves and in line with their authentic culture.

The national political and democratic renaissance is not rain from the sky that falls whenever we desire it, but rather dynamics that produce accumulations, and before thqat it means sacrifices for a political and cultural project backed up  

.by an arsenal for awareness, national mobilization, and modern education policies. 

  

Investment in man is the only way out of the clutches of underdevelopment, and we can

 objectively compare Turkey at the beginning of this century and the New Turkey in 2023.

In my opinion, the dazzling democratic show that took place in Turkey will be a real 

breakthrough for this country to reserve its rightful place among the world's grat powers.

Erdogan has the right to" stretch his legs" as the Arabs say, and Turkey should be proud of

 its political/electoral experience,where the political game was clean enough to make Turks feel  proud to say it and sing it together  with Erdogan: Corruption Yuk, despair Yuk.

 

Conclusion

This is the century of Turkya, as the " SICK Man" is strong enough and can make the west feel deeply sick these days